Month: April 2017

Steady as she goes but some issues on horizon

When the weather is benign the market starts looking for reasons to move.  Last night it was the slow pace of wheat shipments leaving US ports.  Locally markets have been rather steady, with some short term opportunities cropping up on shipping squeezes.

Figure 1 shows a rather boring CBOT wheat chart.  Recent swings in prices have been small on an historical scale. As the volume of supplies dampens any attempts at a real price rally.

CBOT finishes this week down 2¢ at 423¢/bu, having been as high as 429¢ and as low as 421¢.  In our terms, CBOT remains stuck in its $225-235/t range, which while being unexciting on a hedging front, will deliver a price at least 10% higher than the 16-17 harvest.

ASX East Coast Wheat Futures are maintaining their premium to CBOT, possibly assisted by the Bureau of Meteorology’s latest 3 month outlook (Figure 2).  ASX Jan-18 currently sits at $241/t which is obviously better than current values.

The new ASX contract is deliverable in Victoria, NSW and Queensland, which makes it more attractive to sellers.  Even with the spot contract for May at $221/t, there would be an advantage at some Victoria sites in selling futures and going to delivery, rather than taking site bids which equate to prices $5-10 lower.

There has been intermittent interest in Canola, ASW and Feed Barley in recent weeks, with some growers managing $10-20 premium on published bids when buyers are trying to fill ships.  If you’ve got wheat in store it’s worth looking at the shipping stem to see when boats are going and trying your luck with offers on Clear, or by talking to buyers or brokers.

The week ahead

Figure 2 is even making news in international grain wires, with some concern around the sowing of the coming winter crop.  It hasn’t done much for prices, but if we do see a late autumn break, spot prices are likely to creep higher as growers use abundant grain in store as a drought hedge.

Our target for hedging new crop continues to be at the $250/t level for wheat, and $500 for Canola, both of which are a little way off.  As usual growers are should be hoping that Figure 2 is wrong, and US and or Russian growers get some bad weather during their spring and summer, to take the edge off heavy world supplies.

 

 

A 2017 high for the EYCI

Cattle markets continued to rise this week as tight supply and improving demand continued.  The Eastern Young Cattle Indicator (EYCI) has streaked to a new 2017 high, and sits 100¢ higher than last year.  Finished cattle prices have participated in the rise, but have been left in the wake of young cattle.

Figure 1 shows that the strong prices failed to draw out more cattle this week, with East Coast cattle yardings increasing just 1,300 head.  Cattle yardings were down 28% on the same week last year.   In fact almost every week of autumn (except for Easter) 2016 saw yardings above 60,000 head.  Over the last 8 weeks cattle yardings haven’t managed to crack 52,000 head.

Most of the action was again in young cattle markets this week.  The EYCI gained 27¢ this week to hit a six month high of 666¢/kg cwt, almost exactly 100¢ higher than last year.  The increase in young cattle prices was largely driven by feeders and restockers.  Queensland feeders gained 15¢/kg lwt, while in NSW they were 9¢ higher, to hit 344¢ and 357¢/kg lwt respectively.

Slaughter cattle prices haven’t managed to hit new 2017 highs yet.  Heavy steers bounced back this week, gaining 27¢ on the east coast to sit just below the opening price of 2017, at 568¢/kg cwt.  It’s s similar story for Cows, with prices sitting a few cents below the February high.

Export prices eased marginally this week, with the 90CL indicator coming off highs, down 4¢ to 614¢/kg swt.  While export prices have improved from the start of the year, if supply picks up here we can expect cattle prices to head back towards export levels.

The week ahead

It will be interesting to see if the rise in the EYCI stops, or at least starts to slow.  It’s hard to see any increases in supply, as it seems the cattle either aren’t there, or are unable to make it to market.

The concern for buyers is if supplies are tight now, it’s a long time until September when the spring supply hits the market.  There might be a flush when the floods recede, but it’s likely to be short-lived.

Changing Chinese tastes for sheep meat

Key points:

  • Australian lamb exports volumes to China are at 49% above the seasonal five-year average and is being shadowed by a decrease in mutton exports
  • Growing middle class wealth and increasing in interest for premium products in China is a potential cause for the shift in demand from mutton to lamb
  • A narrowing price gap between sheep meats may also be a contributing factor

The release of Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (DAWR) trade data this month shows a continued surge in demand for Australian lamb from Chinese buyers. Indeed, the first quarter trade volumes show a distinct shift in preference for Australian lamb over Australian mutton.

Figure 1 shows the lamb export volumes for 2017 sitting at 49% above the seasonal five year average levels for this quarter. Volumes increased again for March to 4,477 tonnes swt, just shy of the record high in June 2016. This is deviating from the usual March drop that occurs towards the seasonal trough.

The story for sheep exports to China tells a completely different tale in Figure 2. The total volume exported over the first quarter of 2017 was nearly half of that two years ago, begging the question, is China’s appetite for sheep meat changing or are relative price differentials between lamb and sheep encouraging the shift?

To delve a little deeper into the question, in Figure 3 we have lined up the change in mutton and lamb export volumes from 2015 to 2017 for the season so far. Interestingly, we can see that where mutton volume has dropped off very closely aligns with increases in lamb consignments. Particularly in the months of January and March, there is a near exact shift in volumes from the one sheep meat to the other.

Chinese consumers have always had a strong affinity to lamb, however, it’s likely that the demand will only continue to rise with the changing demographic. The growing middle/upper income class and open food culture of the younger population is prompting a shift in taste towards ‘premium’ import meats. Where historically cheap proteins for the hot pot were in high demand, the ‘foodie factor’ is taking over, with consumers in China willing to pay a premium for quality and a sense of superiority on their fork.

What does this mean?

Our current sheep meat export prices may also be playing a part in the changing trade trends within China. Over the last season, the basis of the spread between mutton and lamb has narrowed significantly. In 2015, we had the price of mutton at around 50% of lamb but now we’re seeing the mutton price close in.

The NMI is even fighting against the typical seasonal drop, so far holding steady and still close to record highs of 2011. It could be that the reducing price differential between mutton and lamb is also encouraging the shift in consumption choice towards the premium meat as Chinese consumers are more willing to buy for quality.

Record ESTLI attracting supply

The Eastern States Trade Lamb Indicator (ESTLI) hit an all-time high this week at 681¢/kg cwt encouraging a lift in throughput, particularly out of Victoria and South Australia, as robust prices draw out supply.

Figure 1. shows the rising trend over the last few weeks in East coast lamb throughput with a further 21,000 head added to yarding numbers this week to reach just short of 204,000 head. Since the recent dip in mid-March, lamb throughput has risen 35.4% in response to the firmer prices on offer at the saleyard.

National price movements saw Restocker Lambs leading the charge, up 9.1% to $115 per head. In the remaining categories, we saw lamb posting gains of 3.5-5.5% on the week, more in line with the 4.1% increase displayed by the ESTLI – Figure 2. National over-the-hooks prices also firming for all categories of lamb by about 3%, while the National Mutton Indicator posted an impressive 8.2% lift on the week to close at 490¢/kg cwt.

In US$ terms, lamb prices have reached a seasonal peak at 513US¢/kg cwt, this is only the second week it has been above 500US¢ this year – Figure 3. Despite the record local prices for Aussie lamb being received by producers at the moment lamb prices in US terms have been a lot higher. During the 2010/11 season our lamb in US terms reached toward 675US¢/kg cwt so at current levels it is still 24% off its all-time highs.

The week ahead

The continued supply coming forward could see the recent upward momentum in lamb prices start to slow down in the coming weeks, particularly if producers are further encouraged by the firm prices on offer. The ESTLI may see some consolidation around current levels before the tighter supply into the Winter period should provide further support to probe above 700¢.

The market giveth, and the market taketh, then gives back again!

The exciting wool market experienced over the past 6 months has now become a confused beast. Despite reports of a lack of supply across the wool pipeline, from farm woolsheds to processor mills, the market again spent the week in reverse. Interestingly, on Thursday the market shifted gears and rebounded to finish strongly.

The EMI closed down 43 cents in A$ terms at 1449¢ and also softer in US$ terms at 1101¢, down 50¢. In Fremantle, the later selling time and strong finish to the week resulted in an indicator less effected with a 29¢ decline in A$. terms for the week – Fig 1.

It was almost a tale of two sales for this week, on Wednesday the EMI & WMI lost 45 & 48 cents respectively, 18 MPG fell 96 cents and 21 MPG in Melbourne was off 55 cents -Fig 2.

The reversal on Thursday saw the EMI gain 2 cents, however the WMI finished plus 19 cents for the day with reports of a strong finish to the market. Gains were across the Merino combing section, 18 MPG plus 16 and 21 plus 19 cents in Melbourne.

Fremantle was stronger with 18.5 MPG finishing up 22 cents and 21 up by 31 cents.

Fremantle provided good entertainment, on Wednesday 33% of fleece lines offered were passed in, and withdrawals for the Thursday sale were significant.

It seems that the falls on Wednesday encouraged exporters to book business and when they returned on Thursday to a reduced offering we saw the resultant rally. This caused the pass-in rate to fall compared to Wednesday, in Fremantle for example the first day a total of 29% was passed-in, however the next day this rate fell to 11.4%. Also impacting was the withdrawal of 20% in reaction to the price falls of the previous day.

The week ahead

This has been the second week of a dramatic wool market correction, coming at a time of tight stock positions across the wool pipeline. That said, it was noted by one buyer that for the past month wool offerings have been increasing, so perhaps this was a test by processors to check the market.

Wool producers are not in any hurry to sell wool if the market retraces like this week, and conversely, they have been keen to sell wool as the market rallied.

While its risky making statements about the market level in the future, the fundamentals haven’t changed despite the market volatility of the past 2 weeks. Supply is tight and mills need to purchase.

Next week we have a reduced offering of 46,200 bales listed for sale with trading scheduled over two days.

Dead Calm

In nautical terms, dead calm is the absence of wind or waves. It feels that way at the moment in the grain trade. The market has largely drifting with little in the way of wind or waves to give momentum in any direction. Will the USDA & IGC report provide some wind behind our sails?

In the summary, we pointed out the largely directionless market, this can be seen in figure 1. The futures market has traded in a largely narrow band between 420-430¢/bu since the beginning of the year, with the exception of a short rise in mid-February caused by concerns of poor US rainfall. It has to be noted that the rise in February, although it looks large on this chart, it is far from an astronomical rise equating to only around $9.

However, a rise in futures does not always equate to a rise in local prices, in figure 2. We can see that during February basis levels around Australia fell close to the same level that futures rose. A real case “One hand giveth, the other taketh away”. In the past ten days, basis in the main ports around Australia has largely stabilised.

Yesterday the International Grain Council (IGC) released their global crop forecasts, and although not particularly positive for prices, does provide some hope for the future. The report indicates that in 2017/18 global wheat production would fall from 745mmt to 735mmt, with end stocks to be around 484mmt versus 513 this year. It has to be tempered that this would still remain the 2nd highest stocks in history. However, it does start to show a depletion in global stocks.

Next week

Overnight the USDA will release their stocks and prospective plantings report for the US. The report has the potential to move markets, and with expectations of diminished plantings in the US – will there be any surprises?

There are a lot of growers holding grain in their ownership, either on farm or central storage. In a directionless market, it is time to start thinking of alternative strategies to avoid accumulating storage charges.

I will be on holiday for the next three weeks in sunny Scotland, however my counterpart Angus will be covering the grain analysis and commentary.

 

 

 

 

 

Five Questions with StockCo Australia’s CEO Richard Brimblecombe

When talking agribusiness or farming with StockCo Australia’s CEO, Richard Brimblecombe, you’ll witness a true passion and youthful exuberance from a person who truly loves what he does and who he does it for. He’s spent the past five years heading up the Australian opperation of agrifinance business StockCo. In that time StockCo has seen a steady increase in its customer base on both sides of the Tasman and, as Richard talks about below, the future of the industry is looking incredibly exciting.

Tell us a little about yourself, your background and how you came to be the CEO at Stock Co.

My family had irrigation, dry land farming and grazing interests in southern Qld. After working on the family properties for a period of time I pursued a career in agribusiness, working in senior roles at Suncorp, Namoi Cotton, Landmark and CBA.

I met the founder and majority owner of StockCo’s Australian business whilst I was at CBA. I immediately fell in love with StockCo’s business model and could see a huge opportunity for StockCo to assist livestock producers by providing a new and innovative source of capital that wasn’t available from Australia’s banks. I was also drawn to the customer-centric culture and “can do” attitude that was evident across the entire team at StockCo. It was clear this was a professional organisation with an incredibly strong culture that put the customer at the centre of everything it does. I immediately wanted to be part of it and was delighted when I was offered the role as the CEO of StockCo’s Australian business.

I’ve been CEO of StockCo’s Australian business now for a little over five years. That period of time seems to have passed in a heartbeat. We now have well over 1,000 customers nationally, formal distribution agreements with Elders, Sprout Ag and Ruralco, and close working relationships with many independent agents.

It’s been a real privilege and a pleasure to develop StockCo’s Australian business and to be part of such a committed and customer focused team. The most rewarding part for me personally is that we’ve been able to help so many customers generate improved returns from their livestock businesses by providing the capital required to fully stock their existing business or to fund new business opportunities.

Can you explain the relationship between Stock Co, a client and their bank?

This is an important question because it goes to the heart of StockCo’s business philosophy. Firstly, StockCo is not a market disrupter like, for example, Uber.

StockCo’s focus is to enhance our customers’ relationship with their bank rather than disrupt it. We only provide funding for livestock. We don’t provide term loans, overdrafts, equipment finance or transaction banking services. Therefore we don’t compete with banks. We structure our security arrangements so that we don’t interfere with the security arrangements already in place between our customer and their bank. StockCo focuses on clients who enjoy a good working relationship with their bank, but who may not be able to access all of the funding they require to fully stock their existing livestock enterprise or to fund expansion plans. Our focus is to provide the additional capital that our customers require, but that which their bank may not be able to approve for them.

This enables our customers to fully stock their existing properties or feedlots or enables them to purchase or lease additional properties and direct bank funding to ongoing property development. This translates into a win : win situation for both our customers and their banks. StockCo’s philosophy is to work in with customers and their banks so that everyone wins.

What trends are you seeing in Australia at the moment?

Currently, we are in a positive part of the commodity price cycle and StockCo is assisting our customers to make the most of the current good prices. Australia enjoys providence as a clean, green producer of high-quality food products. This should lead to sustained demand for our produce for the longer term from premium markets.

On a more general level, Australian livestock producers are right on the edge of a transformational technology revolution. We see huge opportunities at the moment across a broad spectrum of areas, from livestock genetics, plant and pasture genetics, to enhancements in nutrition, management and husbandry techniques. Right now, casting our eye over the horizon, we are excited about the concept of virtual fences and real-time tracking of livestock movements.

We will be watching these developments with interest as they have the potential to unleash tremendous productivity gains. Livestock producers are able to access more and more information on their computer or on their phone, meaning access to reliable and fast internet connections are becoming vital. This is translating into improved information flows, resulting in better management decisions and improved risk management. We think there is great scope for producers to increase the intensity of their operations, whilst simultaneously strengthening the sustainability of their businesses.

It’s an incredibly exciting time and we are delighted to be playing a role in assisting our customers to take advantage of the emerging opportunities.

From your experience what are the most common difficulties farmers experience and how does StockCo help them?

Livestock prices have improved significantly over the past three years. This has resulted in improved cash flows for livestock producers. We see many producers are not running their livestock operations at full capacity because they have struggled to access the capital to fund the increased cost of the livestock.

Working capital has been tied up in a significantly higher value of livestock on hand and many producers are carrying less than optimal numbers of stock for no other reason than it has been difficult to access sufficient capital to fund the livestock. So just at the time where producers have a tremendous opportunity to maximise revenue flows, they are finding it difficult to access the capital to fund the livestock that will generate those improved cash flows.

StockCo provides the capital solution that allows clients to maximise income from their livestock operation at a time when profitability is at historically very high levels. This can, in turn, enable producers to accelerate property development programs and bring forward stronger cash flows.

What else should we know about StockCo?

Many people don’t realise that StockCo has been around since 1995. We tend to be viewed as a new market entrant, however, we have been operating continuously servicing livestock markets in Australia and New Zealand for 22 years. Whilst we have been operating in Australia for a long time we made a conscious decision in 2014 to pivot our focus to growing the Australian business and we have experienced a lot of growth in the past three years, however, our fundamental business model has been operating for a long time.

Learn more about the StockCo team here. 

Which restockers are behind young cattle price lift?

Key points:

  • The percentage of purchases of young cattle being bought by restockers is outstripping both feed lots and processors.
  • Nominal volumes of young cattle being sold to restockers in Northern and Southern saleyards are also above longer term averages this season.
  • Price spread patterns show that Southern restockers are more optimistic than their Northern counterparts.

Anecdotal reports of revived restocker activity within the young cattle market suggest that recent rainfall may have given a boost to prices along the Eastern seaboard. But does the underlying data for the Eastern Young Cattle Indicator (EYCI) show this to be the case and if so, is it evenly spread across the Eastern states? Is just a simple glance at the broad restocker activity all that is needed to give a robust picture of the market or is it central to beef analysis to delve a bit deeper into the figures?

Certainly recent discussions with livestock agents reveal that restocker activity in their area is on the rise and a Meat and Livestock Australia news report from last week somewhat confirmed the trend. Indeed, as figure 1 highlights, the percentage of EYCI stock sold to restockers as a proportion of total EYCI sales for the 2017 season has been on a fairly clear upward trajectory. Although looking at restocker purchases in terms of percent of supply doesn’t necessarily indicate increased nominal volumes are being purchased by restockers, but that the proportion of restocker purchases is higher when compared to cattle purchased by feed lots and processors.

Using the underlying EYCI data we are also able to filter and analyse specific components of the broader EYCI market to determine if the robust restocker demand this season is stemming from a particular region. Separating EYCI restocker purchases into northern and southern saleyard groups, with Dubbo saleyard marking the mid-way point between North and South, we can assess how evenly distributed the restocker activity is along the East coast.

During February the volume of cattle purchased by restockers at Northern sale yards on a weekly basis peaked near 7,000 head (double the volumes of the ten-year average during this time frame, but similar to levels seen during last season). Restockers in Southern sale yards have seen weekly volumes peaking at around 1,200 head during March, which is nearly 2.5 times the volumes normally seen at this time of year – according to the pattern set by the ten-year average (Figure 2).

Taking a look at the price spread patterns for Southern and Northern sale yards we can see that there are some stark differences between restocker activity in each region. Figure 3 shows that Southern restockers have been happy to pay a premium spread above the EYCI trending along the top of the normal seasonal range and peaking last week at 8%, equivalent to 687¢/kg cwt. In contrast, Northern restockers are paying a premium spread in the lower end of the normal range and below the seasonal average level for this time of year at 2%, equivalent to 649¢/kg cwt – figure 4.

What does this mean?

The above average volumes of cattle being purchased by restockers in both the North and South certainly shows the intention to rebuild the herd is evident across the Eastern seaboard. Although, considering the magnitude of destocking experienced in the North during the large turnoff during the 2013-2014 seasons the current volume of cattle going to restockers in Northern saleyards isn’t much dissimilar to levels seen last season.

In addition, the spread pattern of the North and South indicate that Southern restockers are more optimistic of the current season or are experiencing somewhat better seasonal conditions than their Northern counterparts, as signalled by intentions to pay much more above the EYCI than normal for this time of year.

Increasing yardings can’t dampen prices

Lamb prices continued to charge higher this week, despite stronger yardings.  The higher prices are showing no signs of dampening demand, with some categories hitting new highs, while others eased off this week.

East Coast lamb yardings responded to the higher prices of recent times by ramping up to a five week high.  Producers are obviously looking to take advantage of higher prices by cashing in any lambs that are near ready.

Lamb yardings were much higher than last year, but Easter came early in 2016.  The Eastern States Trade Lamb Indicator (ESTLI) gained 22¢ this week, hitting 654¢/kg cwt, just 11¢ off the peak hit back in February (figure 2).

It was NSW which drove the ESTLI higher this week, as the 25¢ rise saw a new record price of 659¢/kg cwt.  Light lambs in NSW saw a 42¢ rise to be the highest indicator in the land, at 673¢/kg cwt.  By contrast, light lambs in SA fell 58¢ to sit at a paltry 539¢/kg cwt.  For a 17kg cwt lamb that is a $23/head difference.

It wasn’t all bad news for growers in SA, with mutton prices rallying 97¢, or 28% to 437¢/kg cwt.  Still behind Victoria at 482¢, SA prices couldn’t stay that low for too long.  The rally in Mutton on the east coast was offset by a 76¢ fall in WA and as such the National Mutton Indicator gained just 3¢ to 453¢/kg cwt, it can’t quite get to the record (figure 3).

The week ahead

The rain from Cyclone Debbie shouldn’t impact the lamb market too much, but it won’t hurt. Lamb supply out of northern NSW is likely to be disrupted, so we can expect some solid support for lamb markets.  Some forward contracts for trade lambs have been floating about this week at 670¢ for May.

While processors don’t always get it right on their forwards, there is little to suggest they are going to look silly by being a long way above the market.

 

Debbie does EYCI

Increased throughput across the Eastern states this week, although the rise in Queensland’s yarding numbers not as strong as the Southern states, with added difficulty in transporting stock and saleyard closures due to the extreme weather having an impact. Despite the stronger supply prices generally higher for most categories of cattle apart from heavy steers as widespread rain helps to boost demand.

Figure 1 highlights the rainfall pattern across the nation this week with the impact of cyclone Debbie clearly evident. Rainfall further south also present and helping to lift restocker spirits in the southern regions as outlined in the analysis piece released yesterday by Mecardo.

East coast yardings up 17.5% on the week to just shy of 45,000 head – figure 2. Queensland throughput at similar levels to the East Coast weekly gains, up 17.2%. Overshadowed by the leap in yardings from NSW though, with a 28% lift in throughput there unable to dampen prices too much.

The national cattle indicators mostly higher this week with 2-4% gains recorded for all categories except heavy steers. The national heavy steer indicator dropping 3.4% on the week to close at 294¢/kg lwt. The Eastern Young Cattle Indicator (EYCI) mirroring the broader market up 4.4% on the week to close at 649.75¢/kg cwt. Young cattle prices continuing to find support from restocker buying and the added benefit of higher beef export prices, with the 90CL frozen cow up slightly – figure 3.

The week ahead

The prospect of added cattle throughput pre the Easter break now that the inclement weather has begun to settle down could see prices consolidate or slightly soften in the coming few weeks, before trekking higher again post Easter.